← Back to the blog

Team time trial: turns, drafting and how long each turn should last

Time trial7 min readBorja Alfaraz

Team time trial

+4.1 km/h

That is what four riders taking turns gain over one rider alone, at the same 300 W average power.

Model calculation: CdA 0.24 m², 78 kg, 30 % drafting saving in second position and 35 % behind.

Summary. In a team time trial, each rider’s average power yields more speed than riding alone because most of the time is spent on a wheel. Using a power model1 and drag reductions of the order measured in simulation and wind tunnels2,3, we calculate the team’s speed, the power each position requires and how long a turn can last given the anaerobic reserve W′5.

Four riders holding 300 W on average while taking turns ride at about 47.5 km/h; one rider alone at the same 300 W rides 43.3. The gain comes from drafting, but it has a price: at the front you need about 386 W, almost 30 % above the average, and that limits how long each turn can last.

How much is saved in each position?

Riding on a wheel reduces drag because the rider ahead breaks the air. For two riders very close together, simulations give around 27 % less drag for the rider behind and a small saving, a few per cent, for the rider in front too2. In a line of four, the rear positions save somewhat more than second3, and in a large peloton the saving can be much larger4.

This article assumes a 30 % saving for second and 35 % for third and fourth. With equal turns, each rider spends a quarter of the time in each position, so their average drag is 25 % lower than riding alone.

How much power does each position take?

Team averageSpeedFrontSecondBehind
300 W47.5 km/h386 W283 W266 W
350 W50.2 km/h452 W330 W309 W

Table 1. Power required in each position to hold the team’s speed. Model calculation [1] with the assumptions in the text.

The gap between riding in front and behind is over 100 W. That is why a team time trial is not won on average power but on how well turns are shared: the rider in front works above critical power and spends reserve, and recovers it on the wheel.

How long should a turn last?

The W′ balance model lets you calculate it5. A rider with 340 W critical power and 20 kJ of W′ pulling at 420 W spends 80 joules of reserve per second. If they do not want to spend more than half of it per turn, the turn should last at most about 2 minutes; at 440 W, little more than a minute and a half. Behind, at 266 W, they rebuild reserve until their next turn.

  • Shorter, more frequent turns let you ride faster at the front without emptying the reserve.
  • Different riders, different turns: the rider with more critical power or more W′ can pull longer. Equal turns with riders of different level usually cost time.
  • The changeover has a cost: each change breaks the line for a moment. With very short turns that cost multiplies.
Rule of thumb: turn length is set by each rider’s W′ reserve, not by the clock. Plan how much reserve each rider spends at the front and how much they recover behind.

What is known and what is not

That drafting greatly reduces drag is well measured in wind tunnels and simulation2,3,4. What is uncertain is the exact value for each team, which depends on wheel gap, position and crosswind. Measuring each rider’s CdA alone and in line with the virtual elevation method is the way to use real values in the plan.

Frequently asked questions

How much do you save on a wheel in a team time trial?

Around 25 to 35 % less drag depending on position and the gap to the wheel ahead.

How long is a turn in a team time trial?

It depends on each rider’s W′ reserve and the power the front requires. With this article’s numbers, between a minute and a half and two minutes.

References

  1. Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE, McFadden KL, Coggan AR. Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech. 1998;14(3):276-91. doi:10.1123/jab.14.3.276
  2. Blocken B, Defraeye T, Koninckx E, Carmeliet J, Hespel P. CFD simulations of the aerodynamic drag of two drafting cyclists. Comput Fluids. 2013;71:435-45. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.012
  3. Barry N, Burton D, Sheridan J, Thompson M, Brown NAT. Aerodynamic drag interactions between cyclists in a team pursuit. Sports Eng. 2015;18(2):93-103. doi:10.1007/s12283-015-0172-8
  4. Blocken B, Toparlar Y, van Druenen T, Andrianne T. Aerodynamic drag in cycling pelotons: new insights by CFD simulation and wind tunnel testing. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2018;179:319-37. doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2018.06.011
  5. Skiba PF, Chidnok W, Vanhatalo A, Jones AM. Modeling the expenditure and reconstitution of work capacity above critical power. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(8):1526-32. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182517a80

Related articles